04302017Headline:

Central Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania

HomePennsylvaniaCentral Pennsylvania

Email Michael Monheit Michael Monheit on LinkedIn Michael Monheit on Twitter Michael Monheit on Facebook Michael Monheit on Avvo
Michael Monheit
Michael Monheit
Attorney • (215) 840-6573

When did actos come on the market and should it come off?

1 comment

The diabetes treatment drug Actos, made by Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., is now at the center of dozens of lawsuits in the United States over claims that prolonged used of Actos increases the risk of developing bladder cancer.

Actos was approved for sale on the market in July of 1999. Other variations of the drug pioglitzaone—all manufactured and sold by Takeda—include Actoplus Met, approved in 2005; Actoplus Met XR, approved in 2009; and Duetact, approved in 2006. Until news of the link to bladder cancer emerged, Actos had been widely used: in a span of just 10 months in 2010, nearly 2.3 million patients filled a prescription for a pioglitazone-containing product.

But now, some European countries have completely banned the sale and use of Actos given its link to bladder cancer. That hasn’t happened yet in the United States and doctors continue to prescribe Actos despite the serious risks that it presents. Instead of a complete suspension of the use of Actos, doctors in the United States are being advised to not prescribe the drug to individuals who have had bladder cancer in the past or who currently have it. But what about the thousands of patients who don’t have that medical history and are still long-term Actos users? Is Actos safe? Should its sale be suspended in the United States? Is it really safe to continue prescribing Actos to diabetic patients? Or do the risks outweigh any potential benefits?

Bladder cancer usually starts from the cells that line the bladder, also known as transitional cells. While it is difficult to say what exactly causes cancer to occur in a specific patient, it is generally understood that it can be triggered by chemical exposures, cigarette smoking, radiation and chemotherapy, and even unsafe drugs—such as Actos.

Diabetic patients who are currently prescribed Actos or who have taken it for long periods of time in the past deserve to understand the risks associated with their treatment—including the possibility that Actos will increase the likelihood of bladder cancer. If you or a loved one received a bladder cancer diagnosis after extended use of Actos, you may have legal recourse.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. up arrow

    I was taking Actos in 2002

    Actos is produced by Takeda Industries and co-marketed by Eli Lilly.
    Eli Lilly Zyprexa can *cause* diabetes.
    I took Zyprexa a powerful Lilly schizophrenic drug for 4 years it was prescribed to me off-label for post traumatic stress disorder was ineffective costly and gave me diabetes.
    Eli Lilly’s #1 cash cow Zyprexa drug sale $40 billion dollars so far,has a ten times greater risk of causing type 2 diabetes over the non-user of Zyprexa. So,here we have a conflict of interest that this same company Eli Lilly also is a big profiteer of diabetes treatment.

    (Actos works as an insulin *sensitizer*)

    Sooooo,Eli Lilly pushes a drug (Zyprexa) that can cause diabetes…. then turn around sell you the drugs (Actos) to treat the diabetes that in turn can cause cancer!
    What a terrible conflict of interest!
    — Daniel Haszard