Governor Tom Corbett is slated to repeal a short lived Pennsylvania statute mandating that fire sprinkler systems be installed in new one and two-family homes.
Those who support repeal of the law, including the Pennsylvania Builders Association, cite the increased cost that is passed on to the home purchaser as a result of the sprinkler mandate. Some proponents of the repeal state that the increased cost is approximately $15,000 per home.
Conversely, advocates of the sprinkler mandate claim that the cost is far less and the potential life-saving effect justifies the cost. If repealing this legislation results in the loss of one life, I am afraid the cost is too high. Furthermore, in conducting a purely economic analysis, it should be noted that there is increased cost associated with the expected repeal by increased property damage in fires where there is no sprinkler system. A perfect example is a case in which a fire begins in a new construction home without a sprinkler system and spreads to another new home with a sprinkler system. If the sprinkler law was in effect, the damage to both homes could have been mitigated and, hopefully, any loss of life avoided.
The Legal Examiner and our Affiliate Network strive to be the place you look to for news, context, and more, wherever your life intersects with the law.
Comments for this article are closed.